Issue Alert Help & FAQ Search Current Issue
ENTH Navbar



[Full-text Article] [PDF Version] [Create Reference]
[PubMed Citation] [Related Articles in PubMed]

Abstract


doi: 10.1583/04-1421.1
Journal of Endovascular Therapy: Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 200–205.

Telementoring During Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Prospective Study

Marcello Di Valentino, MD1; Mario Alerci, MD1; Marcel Bogen, MD1; Paolo Tutta, MD1; Fabio Sartori, MD1; Bettina Marty, MD2; Ludwig von Segesser, MD2; and Augusto Gallino, MD1

1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona

2Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland



Purpose: To explore the use of telementoring for distant teaching and training in endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

Methods: According to a prospectively designed study protocol, 48 patients underwent EVAR: the first 12 patients (group A) were treated at a secondary care center by an experienced interventionist, who was training the local team; a further 12 patients (group B) were operated by the local team at their secondary center with telementoring by the experienced operator from an adjacent suite; and the last 24 patients (group C) were operated by the local team with remote telementoring support from the experienced interventionist at a tertiary care center. Telementoring was performed using 3 video sources; images were transmitted using 4 ISDN lines. EVAR was performed using intravascular ultrasound and simultaneous fluoroscopy to obtain road mapping of the abdominal aorta and its branches, as well as for identifying the origins of the renal arteries, assessing the aortic neck, and monitoring the attachment of the stent-graft proximally and distally.

Results: Average duration of telementoring was 2.1 hours during the first 12 patients (group B) and 1.2 hours for the remaining 24 patients (group C). There was no difference in procedural duration (127±59 minutes in group A, 120±4 minutes in group B, and 119±39 minutes in group C; p=0.94) or the mean time spent in the ICU (26±15 hours in group A, 22±2 hours in group B, and 22±11 hours for group C; p=0.95). The length of hospital stay (11±4 days in group A, 9±4 days in group B, and 7±1 days in group C; p=0.002) was significantly different only for group C versus A (p=0.002). Only 1 (8.3%) patient (in group A: EVAR performed by the experienced operator) required conversion to open surgery because of iliac artery rupture. This was the only conversion (and the only death) in the entire study group (1/12 in group A versus 0/36 in groups B + C, p=0.31).

Conclusions: Telementoring for EVAR is feasible and shows promising results. It may serve as a model for development of similar projects for teaching other invasive procedures in cardiovascular medicine.

Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm, endovascular repair, stent-graft, telemedicine, remote teaching



© Copyright by International Society of Endovascular Specialists 2005