Issue Alert Help & FAQ Search Current Issue
ENTH Navbar



[Full-text Article] [PDF Version] [Create Reference]
[PubMed Citation] [Related Articles in PubMed]

Abstract


doi: 10.1583/04-1248MR.1
Journal of Endovascular Therapy: Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 649–658.

Frequency and Significance of Lumbar and Inferior Mesenteric Artery Perfusion After Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Gerald A. Fritz, MD1; Hannes A. Deutschmann, MD1; Helmut Schoellnast, MD1; Uwe Stessel, MD1; Erich Sorantin, MD1; Horst R. Portugaller, MD1; Franz Quehenberger, MD2; and Klaus A. Hausegger, MD3

1Department of Radiology, University Hospital Graz, Austria

2Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, University Hospital Graz, Austria

3Department of Radiology, General Hospital Klagenfurt, Austria



Purpose: To evaluate the frequency and influence of perfused side branches (lumbar arteries [LA] and inferior mesenteric artery trunks) on development of type II endoleaks (EL-II) and on volume changes of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) after endovascular repair.

Methods: Of 114 patients undergoing EVR of AAA, 89 patients (83 men; mean age 72±7.5 years, range 51–88) with >6 months' follow-up and no type I endoleaks were retrospectively analyzed to determine any relationships between retrograde perfusion, endoleaks, and sac volume. Data were derived from computed tomographic angiographic (CTA) scans taken before and after intervention, at discharge, and at 1, 3, 6, and semi-annually thereafter in follow-up. Two groups were identified and compared based on their status at 6 months post EVR: without perfused side branches (group 1) and with perfused collaterals (group 2); group 2 was further divided according to the absence (2a) or presence (2b) of endoleak.

Results: Median follow-up was 24 months (range 6–36). Based on a total of 582 CTAs analyzed, 17 (19%) patients developed type II endoleaks (EL-II) during follow-up. There was a significant difference in the number of perfused LAs prior to EVR between groups 1 (n=44) and the 45 patients with postprocedural patent collateral arteries in group 2 (p<0.05); there was no significant difference between groups 2a and 2b (p=0.88) relative to the number of pre-existing patent collaterals. The number of pLAs preoperatively and the rate of type II endoleak were significantly correlated (p<0.05). No type II endoleak was seen in patients without perfused side branches (p=0.01). No significant differences in mean volumes were found between groups 1 and 2a (no EL-II), but significant differences between groups 1 and 2b were seen in later follow-up.

Conclusions: A larger number of patent LAs before EVR was associated with a significantly higher rate of type II endoleak. Patent collateral vessels were common after aneurysm repair, but the frequency decreased during follow-up. Persistent side branch perfusion was associated with increased type II endoleak after endovascular AAA repair. Significant differences in volume changes in later follow-up were seen between patients with or without type II endoleak.

Keywords: abdominal aortic aneurysm, endovascular repair, stent-graft, endoleak, lumbar arteries, inferior mesenteric artery, aneurysm volume, computed tomographic angiography



© Copyright by International Society of Endovascular Specialists 2004